"For those who don't understand, I ask that President Bush recruit them and send them to Iraq," a visibly angry Manuel said amid heckling from opposition lawmakers.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Iraq as a dis
A government official in South Africa's response to cries for South Africa to support regime change in Zimbabwe in response to a financial and democratic meltdown and refugee crisis :
Friday, August 17, 2007
Race & Words
Another thought :
We need some words that allow for discussion of race, the biology, and race, the social construct, like how we have "sex" and "gender".
We need some words that allow for discussion of race, the biology, and race, the social construct, like how we have "sex" and "gender".
Mitt Romney is an idiot
I'm not sure if the fact that Romney is doing well in the polls right now makes me say "Geez what's wrong with people?" or "Yay, the Republicans who lost the right to govern by being far too compliant with Bush for far too long are surely going to lose if Romney wins the nomination!"
According to Slate's Human Nature column:
"Mitt Romney is demanding lifetime federal GPS tracking of anyone who has used the Internet to commit a sex offense against a minor."
Specifically for people who used the internet ... that cyber, not physical network of computers to commit sex crimes should have to wear lifetime Global Positioning Satellite tracking devices.
Its like he's just playing Political MadLibs... "Ok... I need a crime everyone disagrees with, I need a reference to the menace of modern technology, and then I need a reference to the glories of technology... Ok, I got it..."
According to Slate's Human Nature column:
"Mitt Romney is demanding lifetime federal GPS tracking of anyone who has used the Internet to commit a sex offense against a minor."
Specifically for people who used the internet ... that cyber, not physical network of computers to commit sex crimes should have to wear lifetime Global Positioning Satellite tracking devices.
Its like he's just playing Political MadLibs... "Ok... I need a crime everyone disagrees with, I need a reference to the menace of modern technology, and then I need a reference to the glories of technology... Ok, I got it..."
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
SA & Thoughts on the N Word
A long rambling converstation with my South African flatmate and my American flatmate yielded an interesting thought :
To restrict the 'allowed' usage of the N-word to Black people negates the attempt to take the negative meaning away and "take it back" into an empowerment sense.
By saying, "Yes this word is still bad if you, anyone who isn't me, uses it, but it's ok if I use it because then it has a different meaning," still maintains that old definition, still connects it strongly to that word. For a word to gain a new meaning, it must be whole heartedly accepted as having that new meaning, which includes letting whomever wants to express that sentiment use that word to do so.
Sure, if a member of the KKK uses it, they're probably going for that whole bad definition. But if the word is being re-defined, why then can't an ally to the cause also use it, in order to bring more popularity to the positive, empowering definition?
For example, the word 'queer' I would argue can be used by anyone sympathetic to the cause of gay rights, or about groups, events, etc rallying around the issue. The word can now start to mean something positive, because that new meaning can become accepted.
The shoud of shock that covers the N-word continues to give power to the minority of the population that want to use it to hurt another group of people, and with everyone continuing to act as if the word has such extreme power, it continues to do so.
And, just by way of comparison, a word with similar connotation in South Africa simply is not used by anyone appaprently.
To restrict the 'allowed' usage of the N-word to Black people negates the attempt to take the negative meaning away and "take it back" into an empowerment sense.
By saying, "Yes this word is still bad if you, anyone who isn't me, uses it, but it's ok if I use it because then it has a different meaning," still maintains that old definition, still connects it strongly to that word. For a word to gain a new meaning, it must be whole heartedly accepted as having that new meaning, which includes letting whomever wants to express that sentiment use that word to do so.
Sure, if a member of the KKK uses it, they're probably going for that whole bad definition. But if the word is being re-defined, why then can't an ally to the cause also use it, in order to bring more popularity to the positive, empowering definition?
For example, the word 'queer' I would argue can be used by anyone sympathetic to the cause of gay rights, or about groups, events, etc rallying around the issue. The word can now start to mean something positive, because that new meaning can become accepted.
The shoud of shock that covers the N-word continues to give power to the minority of the population that want to use it to hurt another group of people, and with everyone continuing to act as if the word has such extreme power, it continues to do so.
And, just by way of comparison, a word with similar connotation in South Africa simply is not used by anyone appaprently.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
